Thursday, February 14, 2008

Democrats fear superdelegates could overrule voters

(CNN) -- Some Democrats say they fear their party's method of picking a nominee might turn undemocratic as neither presidential candidate is likely to gather the delegates needed for the nomination.

art.dem.convention.file.afp.gi.jpg

The Democrats' superdelegate system is supposed to avoid turmoil at the party's conventions.

Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are running neck and neck toward the party's August convention in Denver, Colorado. Most projections show neither getting the necessary 2,025 delegates in the remaining nominating contests before then.

Party rules call for the votes of superdelegates -- 800 or so party officers, elected officials and activists -- to tip the balance. The party instituted the system to avoid the turmoil that a deadlocked race would create at a convention.

But even some superdelegates are questioning the system, as the party heads toward the conclusion of a race in which they might determine the outcome.

"It's not the most democratic way of doing things," said Maine superdelegate Sam Spencer. Video Watch the scenario for a "civil war" in the Democratic Party »

While pledged delegates are allocated with the understanding they'll vote the way their state went in its primary or caucus, superdelegates are free to vote however they want. And even if they pledge their support to a candidate, they're free to change at any time.

Clinton already has 234 superdelegates and Obama has 157. But Obama has a sizable lead in pledged delegates, 1,096 to 977, and is on a roll, having won all eight nominating contests since Super Tuesday. See which states pledged delegates come from »

Larry King Live
How will the presumptive GOP presidential nominee take on Clinton or Obama? John McCain goes one-on-one with Larry King.
Tonight, 9 ET

If the superdelegates were to tip the balance against the popular vote, the turmoil would last long beyond the convention, longtime Democratic Party strategist Tad Devine said.

"If a perception develops that somehow this decision has been made not by voters participating in primaries or caucuses, but by politicians in some mythical backroom, I think that the public could react strongly against that," Devine said.

"The problem is [if] people perceive that voters have not made the decision -- instead, insiders have made the decision -- then all of these new people who are being attracted to the process, particularly the young people who are voting for the first time, will feel disenfranchised or in some way alienated," he said.

Superdelegates were established in 1982 to bring more moderate Democrats back to conventions, where their attendance had been dropping since the 1950s, and to relect the party's mainstream more accurately.

"[Superdelegates] are the keepers of the faith," said former San Francisco, California, Mayor Willie Brown. "You have superdelegates because this is the Democratic Party. You don't want the bleed-over from the Green Party, the independents and others in deciding who your nominee will be."

Devine was part of the first campaign to benefit from the roles of superdelegates -- that of former Vice President Walter Mondale in 1984.

Mondale's 1984 campaign went into the party convention with too few delegates to secure the nomination against the campaigns of former Sen. Gary Hart and Jesse Jackson. Mondale had received more votes, but Hart had won more states.

Mondale was able to line up the superdelegates going into the convention and avoid a fight on the convention floor.

Each campaign actively is trying to encourage the unpledged delegates to pledge to their side.

Jason Rae, a 21-year-old Wisconsin superdelegate, said he's gotten calls from former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright from Hillary Clinton's camp, and Obama's wife, Michelle, visited with him during a campaign stop Tuesday in Wisconsin.

Rae said he hasn't yet decided how he'll vote in Wisconsin's primary on Tuesday.

Crystal Strait, a party activist from California, said she's received calls from Clinton herself and daughter Chelsea but she remains uncommitted.

Massachusetts superdelegate John Walsh said he'll stay loyal to Obama despite the fact that the senator lost the primary in Walsh's state. So will fellow Massachusetts superdelegates Sens. Edward Kennedy and John Kerry.

Among Clinton's committed superdelegates are Harold Ickes Jr., her husband's former deputy chief of staff; Terry McAuliffe, who led her husband's 1996 re-election campaign and is chairman of her campaign; and her husband.

Whether those superdelegates stay committed to their candidates, even if it means tipping the outcome of the race against the pledged delegate lead or the popular vote, could split the party.

"It's in a total contradiction of the way the Democrats have set up their primary process, with all this proportional representation," said CNN political analyst Amy Holmes. "The whole point of it was that no one could walk away with the elites. And if this is decided by superdelegates, I think the Democratic Party morally is going to be looking at each other and say, 'What did we just do?' "

advertisement

Devine said it could hurt the party in the general election.

"I think it will hurt us particularly because so many of the policies that we're saying we will pursue in government as Democrats are based on fairness, whether it's the tax policies that we advocate or the social programs we want to advance, there's a fairness component in all of that," he said. "People need to believe, I think, that our process is fair as well, if they want to believe that our policies will be fair."

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Will Superdelegates decide who will become the next President?

Some think so. Mathematically, with the primary race so close there is a possibility that it will come down to the superdelegates. Kind of undermines the democratic process in my opinion, so for those of you who haven't voted yet, please do so. Your vote absolutely counts since delegates are awarded by ratio not "winner takes all".

So what is a superdelegate?
Click here to find out more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate

With such a close race, it may be helpful to contact the superdelegate from your area and petition them to vote for the candidate of your choice by email, mail, phone or in person.

You can find a list of superdelgates who have not yet endorsed a candidate here:
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegates-who-havent-endorsed.html

How do primaries work? Click Here to find out more:
http://people.howstuffworks.com/primary.htm

Monday, February 11, 2008

How can you help? Barack Obama: The Audacity of Hope Podcast Available

Ever wonder what you can do to help?

Besides tradional ways of donating money, volunteering and helping out with call banks, you can simply spread the word of Barack Obama by talking with family and friends or simply passing along this URL of great Obama information, http://getobamaelected.blogspot.com/ through email, myspace, facebook, your IM status or by posting as a comment on other blogs or forums.

If you're feeling especially saavy, try the suggestion below:

You don't need money, try spreading the word by asking your friends and relatives if they'd be interested in listening to Barack Obama speak in a non-debate or election based format - there's a huge difference in this format. Have them listen to Barack Obama's The Audacity of Hope via podcast.

You can:
Subscribe them and load their ipod with the podcast from this page.
Send an email to family and friends to listen to the podcast directly located on this page.

Subscribe Free
Add to my Page

Friday, February 8, 2008

Are you a character-based voter or an issue-based voter?

It's interesting how people vote. The media focuses mostly on outstanding problems facing America and the solutions that presidential candidates offer to solve our most pressing issues — health care reform, the war in Iraq, education and so forth. Political pundits often assume that most voters will ultimately cast their ballots for the candidate whose beliefs most closely mirror their own, and for many voters this is true. But not for everyone.

Those who are concerned solely with issues can easily find a suitable candidate using a voting calculator. Answer a number of questions online and you'll be paired with the appropriate candidate who matches your beliefs. Here are two that come to mind:
http://selectsmart.com/president/2008.html
http://www.vajoe.com/candidate_calculator.html

The problem that most of us realize, however, is that a politician’s platform has no real bearing on that person’s effectiveness. A candidate only has four years to implement ideas, and with the bureaucracy in Washington, it's difficult to effect change no matter how good the ideas are. So many Americans have come to believe that there will be no meaningful change in government, and our expectations have become so low that we just hope the president doesn't create additional fires during his or her time in office.

This is a pessimistic outlook, but is the prism through which many people view politics, which causes potential voters to avoid the democratic process all together.

With that in mind, should we put so much weight on the issues? We don't believe so. We believe that character, integrity and an honest evaluation of someone's thought process are what matter the most. It's this commitment to authenticity that would be best disseminated through government because it's the one that's most lacking.

If we could make a paradigm shift in what we value, from issues-based voting to character-based voting, a rapid change would occur in which more appropriate solutions would be implemented. In our assessment of the many presidential candidates, we see these traits best epitomized in Barack Obama, and we’re confident that his approach can spread throughout Washington, D.C. That's why he's such an important figure.

Questions to evaluate in a leader and problem-solver:

• As a leader, how effective is this person in working with others and motivating other people to make things happen?

• Is the person a dictator (only accounting for one solution) or is his or her thought process comprehensive (accounting for several solutions, weighing the options and choosing the best solution for the organization as a whole)? Our nation was founded on tolerance. With that in mind, wouldn't it be best to find a leader who finds a solution that takes all into consideration?

This is just a small group of questions we should be asking ourselves.

The process of evaluating character and the process through which someone solves a problem is the foundation of the hiring process in the most premiere business organizations, such as Microsoft, Google and other Fortune 500 companies. So why shouldn't we use this same criteria when evaluating a president?

If you want judge for yourself how Obama works through a process of arriving to a solution for the issues facing America, buy his book "The Audacity of Hope" or listen to the podcast here:
Obama: The Audacity of Hope Part 1
Obama: The Audacity of Hope Part 2
Obama: The Audacity of Hope Part 3
Obama: The Audacity of Hope Part 4
Obama: The Audacity of Hope Part 5
Obama: The Audacity of Hope Part 6

If you want glimpses into Obama's character, listen to some of his Influences Speeches posted below.

If you were to apply this exercise of evaluating character, integrity and analytical skills to the remaining candidates, we’re sure you would come to the conclusion that Barack Obama excels far beyond that of any of the other candidates and is urgently what this country needs!

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Artist Supporter Video Mix - Yes We Can



Song & video, featuring a star cast, by Will.i.am of The Black Eyed Peas. Inspired by Barack Obama's 'Yes We Can' speech.

Influential Speeches from Barack Obama

Democratic National Convention 2004
Part 1/2 (10 min) Part 2/2 (8 min)

Speech at Ebenezer Baptist Church on MLK 2008